Skip to main content

Tough to learn, tough to teach…


Tough to learn, tough to teach…

Amazingly it is nearly half my lifetime since I finished my science degree. I did not have much trouble with the Chemistry in High School but I remember college Chemistry being a difficult time for me. This did carry through to the in depth Biochemistry. Also, as I freely admit to the students, I have good mental arithmetic but there are areas of Math I left behind me as soon as I could. To this day I use my process for powers and exponents.

I am not sure why the biochemistry was an issue for me. The diagrams and flowcharts of processes should have been up my alley but I struggled to make them stick in my mind. The large classes and distant professors made help quite difficult but I did work with groups of friends in order to make progress. With the Mathematics, there were areas in which I worked well, but others I wanted to just get through. This continued in college when on a youthful whim I chose the honors Mathematics track. I needed tutoring from some family friends to keep me above water in that venture. Certainly group studying and one to one work have served me well when times have been difficult.

I am seeing issues with the same topics now as a teacher. I am working with the Math Department at Curley to ensure that all the students will be taught the relevant parts of algebra and powers before they enter the Chemistry class. I have found myself getting stuck teaching students how to deal with multiplication and division of numbers in scientific notation. I do use my system which makes sense to me to teach the students but it still takes time for them to take be proficient. I am also teaching Photosynthesis and am struggling to make it relevant and interesting. The process and cycle are quite in depth and I feel present students don’t “just learn” things like they might have in years past. But it is a struggle to make it seem worth learning to most.

I already feel like I have learned plenty (but just the tip of the iceberg) in terms of understanding the mind and views of adolescents, and have a clearer view of how to approach curriculum and assessment but it is improving my instruction and being more creative in the classroom that I am most interested in learning in this course. I feel like that would help me now. I am spending time using the book, powerpoints and a variety of worksheets to help the students learn the process. I am working to make the students take and use effective notes, and trying to open their eyes to different study strategies in an effort to help. I feel these attempts which may or may not be successful for this particular topic will at least increase their learning and also will be valuable skills far beyond the science classroom.

Thanks

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Framing Reading; Semantic Maps

Framing our Reading – Vocab Mod 6 Liam Breathnach The three words I chose were endocrinologist, genome and variant. They were all included in an article on how genetics influences height.   The article linked here, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/02/170201131513.htm details how genes are linked to height and how we may learn from, and influence this in future. There are many reasons I chose the word endocrinologist. Its length goes against it initially but it is a great example to show how we can break up words in to sections to get to the meaning. Teaching the word we can expand biological vocabulary and talk about prefixes such as hemo_, and group words like pulmonary, renal, cardiac which pertain to body parts. There is also an opportunity to teach about the various specialized medical professionals you may encounter such as oncologists. The lesson could even stretch to scientists in other fields, such as ecologist or botanists.     ...

Teaching the Genetics of Height and its Implications

Teaching the Genetics of Height and its Implications This week Yetunde and I stayed with the area of genetics. We chose this article https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/02/170201131513.htm from the website Science Daily.   We chose this article as it is cutting edge and can be used to serve as a template for future studies of polygenic traits. The topic of height is also likely to be at the forefront of the minds of many of our students and will therefore have added relevance. We decided to stay with genetics for a number of reasons. It is a large part of the Biology course. We can show our students that Biology is always learning and changing, and I have found that students are fascinated by the power and influence of genetics. I was immediately interested by the article. I have always liked to know facts and dimensions and always wanted to be tall. That I am a centimeter taller than anyone else in my family is still a source of some (childish) pride! Any reflectio...

Teaching a reading lesson on Mutations...

Ed 620 Framing Our Reading Mod 5 Yetunde and I stayed with genetics this week choosing an article linked here https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170419091616.htm from the website www.sciencedaily.com . The article is very interesting. The headline is an attention grabber, certainly in the all-boys school I am in. The word mutant is going to grab their attention. The overall concept throughout the article is good too. On initial reading, students might just get stuck on the idea that we can manipulate DNA in wasps, but there is the underlying idea which can be drawn from them - If this works there are endless possibilities with the CRISPR technology. There are many attractive things about the article. It does give the teacher an opportunity to review or teach about the life cycle of insects to some extent. An easy conversation would be why lots of these type of experiments are done on insects. You would expect to hear about cost and accessibility, but you could hav...