Skip to main content

Special Education Issues


Special Education Issues

Liam Breathnach

Check out the Special education timeline attached…



Special education is a topic of much debate. Anyone who knows anything about kids knows that they are all different, and have varying abilities and experiences. Teaching everyone in the same manner and hoping for a consistent outcome is doomed to fail. Modern education works is designed mainly for students within a ‘normal range” but compulsory attendance means schools must accommodate students beyond the norm (Snowman & McCown, 2015). Special education came into being in the middle of the last century due to pressure from public advocacy groups. Teachers began to be trained and after some Supreme Court decisions in the nineteen fifties students with special needs gained the same rights to education that everyone else had. When IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act was enacted in 1972, schools were required to provide “appropriate” education for all, including Special Needs students, at public expense (Snowman & McCown, 2015)(Hancock, 2016). IDEA has been revisited twice since and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act spells out the rights of Special Needs Students and their families but the basics of the Law are the same today.

Students may be placed in a Special class if they have extraordinary social, intellectual, emotional or physical development. While these broad criteria include gifted students, the tendency is for people to concentrate on students who are below the normal level. The range of things which may cause issue for students include sensory or physical impairments, developmental or emotional disturbance or delay, or intellectual and specific learning disabilities to name a few (Snowman & McCown, 2015). Before qualifying for special education services a preplacement evaluation of the students has to be done. A valid test administered by a multidisciplinary team of trained individuals, in the student’s native tongue has to be completed. Students identified with a disabilities requiring special education have an Individual Education Program, an IEP prepared for them to meet their needs.

As teachers we may be involved with IDEA by referring, students for testing, aiding assessment, preparing IEP’s or implementing IEP’s. In my experience it is IEP implementation which is most common and it should be done in conjunction with the interdisciplinary team who created the IEP, counsellors and other teachers where possible (Snowman & McCown, 2015).

Special Education is extremely complex. Students may have IEP’s for a wide variety of reasons. Some students cannot handle the pressure of being in a class. Some students may have suffered as infants and be lacking the basics of language or commons social protocols. Others still may be suffering due to physical disability or specific learning disabilities. Each of these situations is broad and subjective, and requires accommodations to suit the individual. To add to the difficulty, students with special needs can often have issues with self-esteem, which can lead to motivational and behavioral issues (Snowman & McCown, 2015).

If you have a students with an intellectual disability they will often lack a decent level of organization, and may have issues with processing information and sorting it for retention. Metacognition, learning about how you learn, is a vital step in getting students to regulate their own learning and is very important for teaching students with disabilities. Teachers should break up content and tasks into small manageable pieces, give regular feedback and make sure the students are managing their frustrations and self-esteem as best they can (Snowman & McCown, 2015).

There are often issues with behavior associated with teaching students with Special needs. The teacher will need to be prepared by knowing the contents of the IEP and talking with other teachers where possible. Some disabilities such as ADHD or Autism come with a particular set of behaviors which likely are not compatible with the teacher’s wishes but being as prepared and flexible can help ease situations (Snowman & McCown, 2015). Understanding motivation of actions is often more telling than the action itself and teachers should use their own knowledge, training and experience to deal with issues in a fair manner which does not isolate students or compound the behavior.

Societal issues can have an influence also. While the data does not explicitly and clearly say poor students are more likely to require special education it is unfortunately true that poverty and academic underachievement are related. There are many reasons for this. Students with low socio-economic status, SES are more likely to have instability in their home life, have experienced a poorer level of parenting and have less access to health care. These issues can lead to a life with less importance put on intellectual development, and can lead to emotional or behavioral issues. And these are indicators of students who can end up in special needs classes. Early intervention and correct interpretation of data and interactions is important in order to correctly place students is the most beneficial environment (Skiba et al, 2008).

Many aspects of special education are unfortunate, but I feel the cultural and racial issues are particularly so. The roots of this can be traced back beyond the civil rights movement. African American is particular are not serve well by the system and this is shown by disproportionate number of minorities in our special education programs. It has long been debated that the IQ test has a cultural bias towards white students, and when it is used as an indicator of intelligence it shows white students to be superior. It, and much of the content and curricula in schools reflects “white interest, belief and orientation” (Skiba et al, 2008) and does not give sufficient value to other cultures. This is intertwined with the opportunity to learn. Achievement is directly correlated to opportunity to learn ad if our system is biased, some students unfairly miss out. There are not enough teachers of different cultures and backgrounds who can teach directly to minorities and serve as role models. Also inner cities, which have a tendency to have high minority populations tend to have schools with poor facilities and less experienced teachers. This can lead to a higher referral rate to Special education programs as there is a lack of physical and personnel resources so there are no other options (Skiba et al, 2008).  

Special education is vital and individual’s access to it is, quite rightly, protected by law. But it is a maelstrom of issues. The data on it is vast, and needs to be properly navigated and interpreted. There are complex interactions of social, emotional and intellectual issues - each one labyrinthine in its own right – which can lead to students requiring extra help. The idea of racism being present can cause emotion and cause difficulty when examined. But we must persevere to balance the scales and meet all students where they are. This will require minority teachers being recruited, all teachers being better trained for culturally sensitive teaching and dealing with unwanted behaviors. Increased understanding of the process will lead to teachers being better equipped to intervene at an earlier stage. There would be a more measured approach to pre-referal of students and their assessment. And it would benefit all parties if there was increased collaboration with families and the community (Skiba et al, 2008).

Thanks

 

  

References

Hancock, M. (2016) A Parent Guide to Special Education, the IEP Process and School Success. Retrieved   from http://www.understandingspecialeducation.com/

Skiba, Russell J.; Simmons, Ada B.; Ritter, Shana; Gibb, Ashley C.; Rausch, M. Karega; Cuadrado,

Jason; Choong-Geun Chung. (Spring 2008).  Achieving Equity in Special Education:  History,

Status, and Current Challenges.  Exceptional Children (Vol. 74  Issue 3, p264-288. 25p.)  

McCown, R. & Snowman, J. (2015). Psychology Applied to Teaching (14th ed.). Stamford, Connecticut: Cengage Learning.

 

Comments