Skip to main content

STEM; What is it?


I really come in on the Science end of STEM. I am not the strongest problem solver and only worked on one major novel research project for a few months while in college but I have always had a great interest in how the world around me works. I was always fascinated by animals and loved learning about the human body. Chemistry could be great fun in school and I found lots of it to be quite intuitive. Physics was quite boring to me (my teacher certainly was no help), but long after college my interest was piqued, and I do read books and watch documentaries about Space and mind bending theoretical stuff. I can appreciate the arguments that Physics, with its Mathematical basis is the central Science.

I try to tell people that STEM should reach back to the childhood sense of wonder, and should allow us to ask more focused questions. Kids learn by trying things out and coming up with predictions about what will happen. What parent does not get slain by the “Whys?” and “but Why’s?”. There is a natural inquisitiveness which is really Science! The question what if? can be turned into a Hypothesis with great ease! This is what breeds scientists. This is where STEM is alive! Not learning through repetition, with only a pen and paper, being preached to. You will not find STEM there!

I argue that people should know how their own body works, and am often dumbfounded when they are apathetic. “Don’t you want to know what this little device can call someone anywhere on the planet instantly?” I ask, and lead that on to people who question Science. Do you doubt the guys who put satellites up into orbit, when you believe them when they tell you where your car is to the nearest meter, or blindly accept Instagram posts from Australia? New technologies are rarely made for bad purposes, and they have made our lives easier than we give them credit for. Civilization leaps forward with the advent of, for example, farming, writing, plumbing, microbiology, the combustion engine or the Internet! We need to keep that progress going, maybe now more than ever! Getting kids thinking tinkering, critiqueing, revising and producing will do wonders for them and our future. The more the better. We want boys and girls from all races and creeds learning how things work and saying….What if…?    





After review of Live Binder/Social Media…

A few overriding things that have struck me while reviewing for this round two about STEM. I find it interesting that the issues with STEM these days are well aligned with the issues in mainstream education. There are minorities which are being eased out and there are difficulties with filling positions. Drop outs are also an issue amongst STEM students in college according to America’s STEM problem video. It seems that the issues first studied which led to the STEM push in education have not been impacted as people would have hoped.

When I started my Science degree in Ireland the class I was in was 70% female. Diversity would have been an issue but Ireland of the 90’s was not very diverse. I do remember the Engineering course students being overwhelmingly male however. I am as guilty of implicit bias in this case as the next person though would my mental picture of engineer would be a man. I do not feel it would be an issue if everyone had the same opportunity to follow a path, but the innate biases push people away from certain roles beginning at a very young age. The answer to that particular issue may have to wait for another day!

Another thing you will see from perusing the internet and asking friends on social media is that the general public do not have a good definition or idea of what STEM education is, what the issues are and why the issues should be of concern. We are all educated and educators reading and listening to essays and thoughts of like-minded people.  But even when discussing a STEM program in my school there was differences in opinion about what it was, so what is the person on the street supposed to think? For what it’s worth I think a STEM school should have a range of subjects available to students, but also a spirit if discovery, problem solving and inquiry based project work throughout the classes.

I do not know the numbers for minority AP students in my school but from my Physics class last year there was not a large minority population. I am sure this can be tied into the issues faced by minority students in equal treatment in schools that we have been learning about this year.

As I wrote before I feel like we all have a sense of wonder and instead of censoring that it should be nurtured. The potential is there for all students to grow up with a STEM attitude and appreciation for the roles it plays if certain elements were not so heavy handed and curbed the wonder. We have read many times this year that kids born now will be doing jobs that have not been invented yet. Therefore they need skills and problem solving, they need to know how to learn, adapt and apply knowledge in order to succeed. We need people who can do all these things as we surely are entering a tumultuous time. As I saw in a picture of a protest banner at the Science March in the Spring, how many time did the rich guy save the day on Gilligan’s island? Never. How many times did the Scientist? Every episode…

Thanks

Comments

  1. Liam,
    "What if...?" is an excellent way to describe science. I like to say science is discovery. Discovery does not necessarily mean you'll find an answer to the problem, but you may be able to discover what did not work or what isn't the answer. Discovery always leads in many directions and it may not be the direction one intended. I love that the concept of science is infinite in that aspect.

    Also, because the "what if...?" trend is apparent in your philosophy of science, I'm wondering if you've ever read the book, "what if" by Randall Munroe? It's a phenomenal book. I believe it would spark anyone's interest in science. I actually read it on the suggestion of a 7th grade student in a class I observed last spring.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Liam,

    I really like the message you delivered in your second paragraph. I think the thing that distinguishes STEM education from more traditional approaches to learning is that STEM encourages students to be sceptical, while traditional education asks students to take information for granted and memorize it. Learning content knowledge is important of course, but developing skills and mindsets that allow our students to do something with that knowledge is more important. That’s what STEM is all about. Great post!

    John

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks guys.
    I think the what if is important. Its recurring through out teaching that I feel Science has been taken out of the everyday and put on a pedestal as such. It should be taught as if it is all around us and unavoidable, which it is!
    (And I ordered the book. Thanks for the recommendation!)
    John touches on another recurring theme. There is such a "fear" of being wrong! Nothing works first time and we need mistakes in order to learn from them. And Science is littered with examples of unforseen consequences or results growing into major discoveries or inventions.
    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  4. Liam,

    Like you, I have come into STEM through science. I love learning about how all the different parts of the human body works and how animal bodies and the environment works as well. I have tried to pique interest in my students towards biology by relating everything I teach them to some part of their life. As shocked as I also am when someone isn't interested in learning about how the body works, I understand that everyone has different interests. For example, I can talk about Biology for hours. I will not get bored. But once someone starts mentioning anything about how a computer works or circuits or pretty much anything that has to do with technology, my brain shuts out everything.

    By the way, I think you had a bad physics teacher. I loved physics because my physics teacher broke down the material very effectively and tied everything back to real-life applicable examples.

    Mary

    ReplyDelete
  5. Liam,
    I really liked your comment about our natural sense of wonder, and the idea of nurturing that wonder. A STEM education, when done well can certainly do that. The comments you made about your early physics years, demonstrate how we as educators can certainly do the opposite as well! I too had a less than stellar first go around with physics. However, I had the occasion to take a physics class during my freshman year of college, with a professor, whose love of physics was infectious. So in keeping with your theme, I want to try and remember that a large part of a STEM education is most certainly helping our students to find that excitement, in their discoveries.

    Thanks for a great post,
    Jul

    ReplyDelete
  6. Liam,

    I think your sense of wonder comment is right on target. All too often, educators get so caught up in "covering content," they forget to nurture curiosity and foster the desire for life-long learning. Implicit bias is a difficult issue to tackle- I guess the first step (and perhaps most important) is just recognizing that it is there. Love the Gilligan's Island reference!

    Lisa

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment