ED 710 Blog 1 – Rock Star Theorists
For me the “Rock
Star Theorists” are Dewey and Bruner. Both of these guys would have elements of
constructivism in their views and that applies to me too. Constructivism means that
students are actively engaged in the synthesis of meaning and knowledge
(Flinders and Thornton, 2013). One of my favorite quotes, which I have seen
attributed to Oscar Wilde is “Education is a wonderful thing, but it is worth
remembering from time to, time that nothing that is worth knowing can be
taught!” I think this fits in well with Bruner, who believed in learning
through play, and in the teacher creating opportunities for the students to
learn on their own. Students should also work to figure out a use for what the
knowledge they have, or apply their knowledge to novel situations (Flinders and
Thornton, 2013). I also appreciate
Bruner’s work in looking at cognitive development. It is all well and good
knowing everything yourself but if you do not appreciate or understand how others
learn you are not going to have the desired results.
I like how seemingly unobtrusive Bruner’s methods seem. As if the teacher is but a facilitator, quietly and guiding the play so students absorb lessons by doing what they always have done, playing! Dewey also had a holistic approach to education that speaks to me. He said education is for now, not as a preparation for life. This fits in perfectly with what should be our goal, producing lifelong learners! By guiding the exercises we can teach students required content, how to behave, and how to think. A word that came up often in the Flinders and Thornton (2013) text on Dewey was “organic”. To Dewey and Bruner, school is not a separate entity, a place to spend hours isolated from life. It is a safe place continue with the constant learning of childhood and to build upon it.
I like how seemingly unobtrusive Bruner’s methods seem. As if the teacher is but a facilitator, quietly and guiding the play so students absorb lessons by doing what they always have done, playing! Dewey also had a holistic approach to education that speaks to me. He said education is for now, not as a preparation for life. This fits in perfectly with what should be our goal, producing lifelong learners! By guiding the exercises we can teach students required content, how to behave, and how to think. A word that came up often in the Flinders and Thornton (2013) text on Dewey was “organic”. To Dewey and Bruner, school is not a separate entity, a place to spend hours isolated from life. It is a safe place continue with the constant learning of childhood and to build upon it.
With this in
mind, I have made some extra efforts this year. My teaching has many strengths,
but also, and what I tend to focus on, many weaknesses. I am trying to include
more projects in my classes. Sorely needed, but also surely a great way to
allow students the freedom to take control, and create, all in the name of
learning. I am also working hard to improve my formative assessment, especially
my questioning. Like in my last feedback, the answers may not be forthcoming
but if I can get my students to think more, and question further, they are more
likely to learn. I have increased my use of scientific literacy also. It is
easy to see the benefits. I assign articles, usually from sciencedaily.com, and
come up with questions on a worksheet. The best part are the last few
questions, which are always on these worksheets. I ask them to tell me three
things they learned from the article, and to write three questions they now
have. They also have to read a related article of their choosing and write
three things they learned in that! What I read in these answers is often
enlightening!
Maybe the
most important change I have made is in my “winning’ exercise. For years I have
spoken with students with whom I have conflict over behavior, about good
decisions, and how good decisions for them are, 9 times out of ten, good
decisions for me too! I have determined that often students don’t think enough
about this concept. I know! You are wowed that I came up with the idea that “students
don’t always make good decisions” all on my own! But instead of talking about
it with other staff members and occasionally parents, I have spoken about it
far more often with my classes. We did an exercise at the start of the year
where students got in groups and decided what “wins” would be for them. It was
about setting goals and then making decisions to get towards those goals. An important
point I wanted made was that sometimes there may be losses on the way to a win,
and sometimes what may be a win does not turn out to be positive. If students
stopped to think “is this going to be a win for me?” more often there would be
more success. While this is not content based it is likely a more fundamental
and holistic lesson than I could teach them from a book!
Thanks
References
Flinders,
D. & Thornton, S. (2013). The
Curriculum Series Reader (4th Ed.). Routledge
Comments
Post a Comment