My school, for a private school, has students with a wide range of
Socio-Economic standards who come from many areas in the city and surrounding
counties. We have students whose families are in a position to give enormous
donations to fund raising campaigns and some with many close family members who
are in jail, and are able to pay fees due to school grants and non-profits
around the city. It makes for an interesting mix that is a real selling point
to many. Of course it comes with its own challenges! There is a fledgling operation
where we have about a half dozen Chinese students who attend our school and
stay with host families during the year. These students have wide levels of
English and ability too. It all makes
for an interesting mix.
3 of my five classes are middle stream Freshmen students where I
get a good range from motivated to lazy, well off to struggling financially,
but bar one students there is no real issue with English. My one student is a
recent immigrant and his language is giving difficulty in the class room. I
believe that he should be treated as all other students but with some
accommodations to help him catch up. I tend to give the students copies of my
powerpoints but when I have students working taking writing notes or
assignments I try to make sure that I spend time with him or put him in a
handpicked group so there is support for him. I give him the vocabulary up front for new
chapters and he can check to see what the words are in his native tongue in
order to be prepared. I have emailed his parents to try and involve them but
they are unresponsive. I understand they have limited English too.
With this student, and all my others, I think it is important to
expect high standards and to treat them all in the same way. Whenever in a PD
session, or at the beginning of this course when we spoke about teachers we
liked and respected, Fairness is always a common theme and I try to exhibit
that in class. These two points are tenets of culturally responsive teaching,
and set the tone for the classroom (Snowman & McCown, 2015).
UDL is based on 3 principles;
multiple representation, multiple actions or expressions, and multiple means of
engagement. The teacher is supposed to teach in a broad fashion so that
students are presented with the information in as many forms as possible. Then
students are allowed to interact with materials and then express what they have
learned in multiple modes. This is to ensure that the diverse learners in your
classroom are given lessons in the way they like to learn (CAST, 2010). As
mentioned I use and provide students with the powerpoints which I have prepared
from the book. Students also have an eBook which we use for reference,
questions and often when I have the students read and prepare notes. I also use
online videos which, using a clever program, students watch at home and answer
questions on. The software compiles a spreadsheet of information on how long
the students took and how many questions they got correct. I also use projects
and experiments where possible to make sure that students are using their hands
and thinking about how to correctly collect, tabulate and disseminate data. This
allows for creativity in the forms of assessment beyond essays and multiple
choice questions.
My classroom is far from perfect
and there certainly are areas I need to improve on. I need more projects and I
think I should find a way to incorporate more Portfolio work also. I think the
benefits of that are easy to see. Tests are isolated and when content changes
so much it can be difficult to get students to reflect, and attribute scores to
the content or process. I think with portfolios it is easier to review and show
an overall (if not constant) improvement, with the addition of new skills and
knowledge. This tangible proof could be a real motivator for some students,
especially those with a low self-esteem.
As always, it’s a work in
progress…
Thanks
References
CAST (2010). UDL At A Glance. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/bDvKnY0g6e4
McCown, R. & Snowman,
J. (2015). Psychology
Applied to Teaching (14th ed.). Stamford,
Connecticut: Cengage Learning
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset;
The New Psychology of Success. Ballantine Books
Comments
Post a Comment